3 days left

this is making my brain hurt.

someone else from my databases class agrees – he posted this sentence as a reply to a question:

Remember, if there is an FD in F that has elements split across R1 and R2, you will have to add another relation R3 into the decomposition where R3 contains all items referenced by FDs that are in F but not found in F1 or F2.

i understand what it is saying but i cannot understand how can i understand it.

see?

i’m gone. u of t has killed me!