one day i’ll have a machine that will allow me to make tasty coffee drinks like that.
//back to studying philosophy… in which i will get *80%* if i pull of a 75% on the exam!
update @ 12:01am
that’s it! i can’t do it anymore. the names are starting to mix up in my head. i guess i’ve been studying (with some breaks here and there but mostly studying) since 2pm. wow!
who i have read (book), revised (class notes), reedited (together with overheads) and thus reviewed:
Nagel, Goldman (I, VIII), Kant, Stein (II, V),
who i have done at most 2/3 of the above (and thus not totally reviewed yet):
Singer – done the second half of Kant’s critique, but totally didn’t get first half. e-mailed prof.
Mendus – reviewed but don’t feel confident – keep forgetting what she wrote about (all jokes aside, marriage faithfulness. but she’s arguing AGAINST it)
Hajdin (2) – nothing done except rereading class notes. no lecture notes, so i have to reread the whole thing
Rapaport (I, III, IV) – done all 3 but its all a huge mess in my head and on the paper so still have to totally do
that’s for the short answer part.
for the essay part i have 4 people:
Elliston – “Gay Marriage†(4-5)
Jordan (both arguments) – “Is it Wrong to Discriminate on the Basis of Homosexuality?”
Nussbaum (everything except section II) – “Objectification,” Specific examples from D.H. Lawrence and Playboy, seven ways of treating as an object, discussions of D.H. Lawrence and Playboy.
Primoratz (4-5) – “What’s Wrong with Prostitution?” – first and second feminist critiques
i’ve got a superficial overview of all of them, but for the essay part i need to be cracking these guys off in depth. i’ll probably sketch something out for nussbaum, as her paper is HUGE, one merged gay marriage argument(almost wrote gay prostitution – now THATS a philosophy paper topic), and definitely primoratz as he could appear in both short answer AND essay part.
anyway. time for a break..nnnnow.
update @ 12:22
fun links:
cute illustration of the website development proccess
photoshopped
That is just obsessive even if it isn’t real! :)
if certain visitors bothered to click on the image they would see that our favourite dutch people have competitions for these kinds of designs. isn’t it nuts?
i guess they ARE obsessive since they have contests! :P
yeah…. obsessive over PHOTOSHOP
But it wasn’t a machine that created those, they were by hand. You could do that too. Just get some foam, and chocolate syrup and away you go!